triangletoot.party is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Mastodon instance focused on the Triangle region of North Carolina. Keeping out jerks since 2019. Anti-racist, anti-fascist, and anti-TERF.

Server stats:

78
active users

#notforprofit

0 posts0 participants0 posts today

Another salient lesson for the boards of #charity and #NGO non-profits.

The lazy habit of employing politically connected, wealthy 'donor whisperers' in leadership roles inevitably leads to failure. To the point where it becomes counter-productive to not just fund raising, but the mission itself. Guide Dogs Victoria is a great example of what happens when a charity becomes captured by wealthy 'conservatives', overcome by their own hubris.

Just because people went to expensive schools and are rich, does NOT make them effective leaders, especially in sectors which exist specifically to mitigate the damage and inequality caused by their class.

"More than two-and-a-half years after the charity was thrust into the biggest scandal of its 65-year history, Guide Dogs Victoria has finally lifted its silence over the affair.

The impact of the Frydenberg affair was “huge” and far-reaching, Guide Dogs Victoria chief executive Nicky Long has told The Klaxon, in an exclusive and wide-ranging interview.

“The impact on the organisation has been huge,” Long said.

“I don’t think there’s anyone internally or even at a volunteer level that didn’t feel the ripple effects of what occurred”."

#auspol #guidedogs #notforprofit

theklaxon.com.au/frydenberg-im

The Klaxon · Frydenberg impact "huge" - Guide Dogs Victoria breaks silenceGuide Dogs Victoria was devastated by the Josh Frydenberg scandal, with no part of the organisation left unharmed, says its CEO.

Chicago Reader looks to need donations/engagement. I had been getting my budget ready to start donating (part of my relocation plans TBH) and definitely thought it has always been a great resource!! They are a not for profit and have great articles.

chicagoreader.com/reader/press

chicago.suntimes.com/news/2025

Chicago Reader · Chicago Reader Announces Restructuring and LayoffsBy Chicago Reader

Today is a big day! The Society of Open Social Servers of British Columbia (#SOSSBC) will be opening its own bank account 🏦 and — bonus — @arbutus and @PhotographyElf and I will be meeting in person for the first time! Imagine that! Meeting #opensocialweb people IRL?? 😃

This all means we will be able to officially start soliciting funds to go towards launch and hopefully the sustainable operation of socialbc.ca as it opens user registration in January! 🙌
#notforprofit #socialbc

#notforprofit lately I've become convinced that not for profit companies are the solution to capitalistic market abuse. Why can't we have non profits not just for hospitals, professional associations, and opera companies, but also for cellular infrastructure, retirement savings, road building, and other areas of public good. Does it already exist? Does it just not work? Does capitalistic industry sabotage it? Can someone educate me? Particularly from a Canadian point of view.

Replied in thread

@JamesBazan

Wow! Yeah, I don't think he really understands what will happen if he wins the case. If he does, established case law will then allow people to sue all manner of (bogus) not-for-profit and church entities that engage in political speech — which is most of them!

He'll get one win on the board but no conservative will thank him in the long run.

Replied in thread

@anderseknert Fun fact: in many jurisdictions, you don't pay capital gains on the income you own on shares until you sell them.

So here's a purely hypothetical example, written with no specific individual in mind. Any resemblance to any real-world examples is pure coincidence.

So imagine you and your business partner start a little software company (with a little help from your mum and dad), and you retain a 50% stake.

Now let's imagine this personal computer thing really goes mainstream. People who don't have computer science PhDs even start to use them.

Your little startup benefits from a combination of good business contacts at IBM (thanks again mum and dad), a knockoff of CP/M that some hobbyist wrote based on a manual, copying some design decisions that Steve Jobs copied from Xerox, and a few questionable business moves that the US Department of Justice will later raise in court.

A couple of decades and an antitrust suit for anti-competitive behaviour later, your little tech company grows to a market cap of $100 billion.

Congratulations! Your 50% stake is now worth $50 billion!

At this point, you haven't had to pay tax on that $50 billion worth of shares, because it's an unrealised capital gain.

It's a huge amount of wealth, but the problem is it's all tied up in one company.

And given your firm's increasing reputation for poor cybersecurity practices and regulatory interest on at least two continents, you decide it's prudent to diversify your investments.

In this purely hypothetical scenario, you really have two choices.

You can sell off your shares. But if you do, you're likely to face a truly astronomical capital gains tax bill. We're talking tens of billions of dollars here.

Or.

You could form a tax exempt charitable foundation that you control, and donate all your shares to it.

Not only do you get out of that capital gains tax bill, but you still get to control the capital you accumulated through your foundation.

An added bonus, if your accountant is good, is that you might also potentially get a massive tax credit that will basically wipe out any income tax you may need to pay in the future.

The only real catch is that you do need to donate a portion of the wealth in your foundation to charitable causes.

But you get to pick which ones.

And not only will the amounts you have to donate be smaller than your capital gains tax bill would have been, but you also get lauded for being a visionary humanitarian.

Oh, and one more perk.

Should you choose to do so, you just make sure your kids take over running your foundation when you're done, and they'll get to control the wealth you accumulated—without any pesky estate taxes!

(They can honestly say they only inherited a few million from you, while they run your multi-billion-dollar foundation to boot!)

This is a pure hypothetical, of course...

Hey the #nonprofit that hosts our donations on @opencollective just dropped the bombshell that we need to find a new fiscal host BEFORE MARCH 15 of THIS YEAR.

That's TWO WEEKS.

It is still not clear how difficult the transfer to another fiscal host will be but first we need a new #501c3 to be our fiscal sponsor OR get a lot of help ramping up an existing 501(c)3 #NotForProfit organization one of our volunteers is involved in, but has no staff of its own to be a fiscal host without big help.

On my way to Berlin, to attend an #oat23 satellite event tomorrow before then going all-in at Open-Access-Days 2023!

The satellite event will be focusing on #communityled #openaccess publishing, and I'll be providing input on the important #governance work undertaken in @copim and expertly guided by @openreflections and colleagues from COPIM WP4 over the last 3.5 years that has enabled us to launch, among many other important #OAbooks-related outputs, the @openbookcollect and @Thoth_metadata - both much-needed #notforprofit #communityled infrastructures to bring about an equitable and bibliodiverse #not-for-profit #openinfra ecosystem for #OAbooks in the Humanities, Social Sciences #hss and beyond. #oat23ibi

Dreaming about a #notforprofit platform to foster #mutualaid and free exchange of goods & services ? You can use our public server or deploy your own instance, and start sharing in your community. Navigate the map to discover existing free resources or requests, or add yours. + Filters + searching tools + online chat. shareish.org
#solidarityeconomy #gifteconomy #diverseeconomies #communityeconomies #emancipation #free #opensource #postcapitalism #OpenStreetMap #maps

You want ethical alternatives? Let’s build a campus where folks can work on them without worrying about how to exist day-to-day (or fund their early-stage development like VC does for surveillance capitalism).

The extent of what public funding is doing today is “Oh, looks like you’ve got some alternative functional, let’s pay you to add Feature X to it.”

Better than nothing?

Sure.

Best we can do?

Not by a longshot.

ar.al/2019/11/29/the-future-of

Aral Balkan · The Future of Internet Regulation at the European ParliamentA brief write-up of my talk at the EU Parliament last week with embedded videos of my talk and a link to my slides.

Lovely article about Story Dogs, a program in which children who are struggling to read can build up their confidence by reading aloud to dogs. A great way to encourage kids to read, and hopefully a nice gig for the dogs.

abc.net.au/news/2023-03-26/sto

ABC NewsStory Dogs reading program provides positive, calm influence on children learning to readBy Emma Siossian

I’m delighted to be on board as the new Executive Editor of @J_Cell_Sci!Find out more about the journal and our plans for the year in this editorial by Editor-in-Chief @DrMichaelWay. Do also get in touch if you’ve got any feedback or suggestions for us - we’re always keen to hear from our community.
#cellbio #cellbiology #notforprofit

journals.biologists.com/jcs/ar

The Company of BiologistsPublishing where it mattersSeema GrewalIt's a new year and the time I start thinking about which projects in the lab are going to mature into submissions during 2023. I am, of course, always overly optimistic. You would have thought that after 27 years of running a lab, I would have a more realistic perspective of how progress at the bench really goes. Then again, maybe this exercise is more about deciding whether to cut our losses on some projects or go that extra mile to get that bigger story. Many factors play into my thinking, including where people are in their careers and what they need for the next step, in addition to how much funding is left. It also makes me think about where we want to submit our work, which is an important consideration given how rapidly the publishing world is changing.I am hearing a lot of positive things about Review Commons (https://www.reviewcommons.org/) – a journal-independent peer review platform. Review Commons provides authors with a refereed preprint that can be directly submitted to any of its affiliate journals, including Journal of Cell Science. Because reviewers focus on the science rather than journal fit, and as the process reduces re-reviewing at multiple journals, the platform is becoming increasingly popular. Indeed, around 10% of articles published in Journal of Cell Science in 2022 were published via this route, and we look forward to seeing further growth this year. There is also a lot of discussion, both positive and negative, about the new initiative from eLife, and it will be interesting to see how their experiment pans out and the impact on scientific publishing. There is also the endless march of low-quality Open Access journals that always want me to write reviews or edit an issue and pay them for the privilege of doing so. They shall remain nameless, as I don't want to end up in court, but their effrontery at our expense is frankly galling. I also don't understand why someone would want to publish their research in such journals. Ok, maybe it is easier to publish in these venues, but from what I have heard they effectively accept everything and take very little notice of reviewers' comments; it's clearly all about the money rather than scientific rigour, which has to be the foundation of what we do.In the cell biology world, there are many journals that take things more seriously to ensure scientific standards are maintained. I hope you agree that Journal of Cell Science is one such place. Yes, it can be hard to publish with us, but a paper in Journal of Cell Science commands respect from the community, and I often see our papers cited on people’s slides at meetings. And there is the fact that publishing with us can be completely free (for example, if your institute has a Read & Publish agreement with us or if you opt for our non-Open Access route). So why pay to publish in one of those bottom-feeding journals that you are too embarrassed to put on your slides? Ok, you might say I'm biased as I'm the Editor-in-Chief of Journal of Cell Science. Well even if I wasn't, I would still want my work to appear in a reputable journal. The fact that Journal of Cell Science is published by a not-for-profit publisher (The Company of Biologists) that puts a significant amount of money (I'm not allowed to give figures, but trust me, it's a lot!) back into the scientific community to fund meetings, travelling fellowships, societies and community sites is another reason why it is good – and important – to submit to Journal of Cell Science.Concerning this latter note, I would like to thank everyone who submitted a manuscript to Journal of Cell Science in 2022 (even if your study ultimately was not accepted), as well as the authors who contributed great Reviews and commentaries to the journal. I would also like to thank all of our reviewers; an editor's job is not necessarily what everyone thinks it is (maybe a good subject for a future editorial) but we would be lost without the expert advice of our reviewers, who give up their precious time to help guide us in our decisions. A full list of reviewers and co-reviewers who provided expert help in 2022 can be found in the supplementary information.The COVID-19 pandemic has dominated much of what we have all been doing over the past few years, so it was great that things really started to open up in 2022, and we could all return to business as ‘usual’. We had our first in-person journal meeting on the ‘Host–Pathogen Interface’ in May, which was a roaring success (you can read more here: https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.260456), and we're looking forward to our next meeting on ‘Imaging Cell Dynamics’ in Lisbon in May 2023 (https://www.biologists.com/meetings/celldynamics2023/). If you are interested in imaging, please do join us! Also check out FocalPlane (https://focalplane.biologists.com/), our microscopy and imaging community site, which is expanding its network and has a new Community Manager – Helen Zenner (https://focalplane.biologists.com/2023/01/25/new-community-manager-for-focalplane/). We are also excited about our next Special Issue on the ‘Cell Biology of Motors’, guest edited by Anne Straube (https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.259453), which is already building (https://journals.biologists.com/jcs/issue/136/5) and will be finalised in March 2023. I also encourage you to submit to our Special Issue on ‘Cell and Tissue Polarity’, guest edited by David Bryant (https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.260639).2022 was also a bittersweet year for us, as Sharon Ahmad, who had been the Executive Editor of Journal of Cell Science since December 2007 and with whom I worked closely on an almost daily basis, decided to leave at the end of summer. Sharon, whom I am sure many of you have met at meetings, was intrinsic to the success of the journal, and it is sad to see her leave. We wish her every success in her new job as Executive Publisher of New Concepts in STM at Cambridge University Press. However, I am pleased to announce that Seema Grewal has taken over the role of Executive Editor. Seema obtained her PhD in Cell and Molecular Biology from the University of Leeds, UK, focussing on phospholipase signalling in endothelial cells. Following this, Seema worked as a postdoc at the University of California, Irvine, USA (in the lab of Lee Bardwell), where she investigated signalling specificity in MAPK pathways. She then carried out postdoctoral research in Oxford (working with Helen Mardon) and Cambridge (working with Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz), where she studied early mammalian embryo development and implantation. Seema joined our sister journal Development in 2010, initially as a Reviews Editor before becoming Senior Editor. Most recently, she served as Acting Executive Editor on Development. I'd like to welcome Seema to the Journal of Cell Science team, and I look forward to working with her to make the journal the place everyone wants to publish their best cell biology research.Together, Seema and I (working alongside our academic editors, who we must also thank for their commitment to the journal) will be thinking about how we can continue to serve the cell biology community and ensure that Journal of Cell Science remains a reputable venue for publishing cutting-edge science. With this in mind, please do get in touch if you have any feedback for us. We are always interested in hearing from you – our community.